Assets Seized

  • Reference Number: 1911
  • Date released: 24 June 2009

Request

For the last year that figures are available, would it be possible to provide the following details:

1) The names of those criminals who have had assets seized by your force?
2) A breakdown of the assets seized in each specific case?

3) A breakdown of how the assets seized are to be/have been redistributed (how much on training, salaries etc)?

Response

In accordance with section 1(1) (b) of the Act our response is provided below;

Question 1

This question has now been considered and I am not obliged to supply the information to you are requesting.

Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 requires Cheshire Constabulary, when refusing to provide such information (because the information is exempt) to provide you with a notice which a) states that fact, b) specifies the exemption in question and c) states (if that would not otherwise be apparent) why the exemption applies.

Reasons for Decision:

This information is exempt by virtue of the following sections:

Section 40 (2) The personal data of third parties

Section 40(2) Any information to which a request for information relates is also exempt information if -

(a) it constitutes personal data which does not fall within subsection (1) (your own personal data), and
(b) either the first or the second condition below is satisfied

(3) The first condition is:-
(a) in a case where the information falls within any of paragraphs (a) to (d) of the definition of "data" in section 1(1) of the Data Protection Act 1998, that the disclosure of the information to a member of the public otherwise than under this Act would contravene:-
(i) any of the data protection principles, or
(ii) section 10 of that Act (right to prevent processing likely to cause damage or distress), and
(b) in any other case, that the disclosure of the information to a member of the public otherwise than under this Act would contravene any of the data protection principles if the exemptions in section 33A(1) of the Data Protection Act 1998 (which relates to manual data held by public authorities) were disregarded.

(4) The second condition is that by virtue of any provision of Part IV of the Data Protection Act 1998 the information is exempt from section 7(1)(c) of that Act (data subject's right of access to personal data).

The information you have requested is the personal data of third parties and to release personal data would breach the principles of the Data Protection Act 1998 and would be unlawful.

Question 2

There is no breakdown as such and an explanation by the head of the Economic Crime Unit may help as follows:

In 2008/9 there were 108 confiscation orders made by the crown courts in Cheshire where those convicted were ordered to pay a total of £2,106,307 from assets identified in their possession. The courts actually found that these convicted persons had benefitted from their criminal offending to a total of £10,296,290, however only £2,106,307 had been identified in assets. Many of these assets i.e. properties, vehicles and the like were restrained by a court order, i.e. preventing the owner from dealing with the property as they wanted. This process means that the property itself is not physically taken into police possession. The property is then liquidated by the person against whom the order is made, to satisfy the court confiscation order. Therefore in answer to the question raised in the vast majority of cases no property is physically removed from the criminal, but it is their responsibility to satisfy the order from assets identified and proved to the court.

Additionally there was 87 forfeiture orders made by the Magistrates Court totalling £491,727 in cash seized. This money is forfeited by the court against the person in whose possession the cash was found.

Question 3

The money realised from the confiscation process is physically recovered by the Court Enforcement Unit. Each criminal is given a time to pay the order i.e. a recognition that the process of realising assets takes some time, usually up to 12 months. Failure to pay within this time results in a further default sentence. The money sent to the Court Enforcement Team is vired to the Home Office. The cash seized from individuals which subsequently goes to forfeiture proceedings is banked by Cheshire Police. At the conclusion of the proceedings the money is vired to the government.

The government then allocate a proportion of the recovered funds to the host force based upon the remittance of cash from forfeiture 50%, and the remittance of funds from confiscation 18%.

This money is then utilised by Cheshire Police in the fight against crime.

Back to Category List