Obtaining Data and Costings

  • Reference Number: 2614
  • Date released: 06 August 2010

Request

  1. How much has your force spent in each of the last two financial years (08/09) and (09/10) in the process of obtaining data and analysing data in connection with the “improving public confidence” Government target, that was scrapped by new Home Secretary Teresa May?
  2. If some of this money was spent with external agencies, consultants or companies please state how much was paid to each firm/organisation and what they did for the money.
  3. Are you contracted to keep paying any of these firms in this or forthcoming financial years despite their now being no need for the data to be assembled and collated? If so please explain who you will have to pay and for what service you are contracted to pay them.

Response

In accordance with section 1(1) (b) of the Act our response is provided below;

Question 1

In answer to the first part of the question - relating to expenditure on obtaining data since 2008 - the most relevant costs I can provide are those associated with gathering public perception data via our local confidence survey (Be Safe Feel Safe), for which please see the response to question 2.

However, it is important to realise that much of this work would have been done anyway as part of our responsibility to understand and respond effectively to public concerns. In other words, our surveys do not just ask about that particular target, but also include questions designed to help us deliver a better service to the public.

In terms of analysing the resultant data, I cannot attribute costs to this without doing a considerable amount of work (in excess of the 18 hours limit) that would only provide, at best, a non-definitive, approximated cost. My explanation for this is that data produced from the surveys, has been applied across all areas of policing and therefore handled by a number of people across the whole force (Area staff, Corporate Communications, Police Authority and so on). It has also been evaluated and used by partnership agencies (e.g. Local Authorities) in conjunction with these departments.

It is also important to note that evaluation of this type of data is seen as 'business as usual' for the force, as it has been used to both inform our ability to engage with our communities and understand and deal with the issues that matter to them. The information gathered which includes questions around such issues as antisocial behaviour, the perception of drug-taking etc, - all existing ways of understanding and improving policing for local communities.

Question 2

Please see the caveat in question 1: it cannot be assumed that the full cost is associated purely with the confidence target that has since been scrapped.

However, it is worth noting that Cheshire did receive a grant from the Home Office to cover the cost of the surveys (£46,125).

Question 3

No, we are not contracted to continue to pay that company, but please note that the assumption that there is no longer the 'need for the data to be assembled and collated' is not quite accurate for the reasons outlined above.

All organisations, including the police, need to understand what is important for the people they serve and whether they are in fact meeting those priorities. Following the Home Secretary's announcement, we are reviewing how we approach this to ensure we do so as cheaply and as effectively as possible.

Back to Category List