- Reference Number: 2699
- Date released: 17 September 2010
Request
- How many people have been charged with the following offences
in your force area, while on bail, in years:
2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010. With the offences of
Murder/Attempted Murder, Rape/Attempted rape, Armed
robbery. Please, if possible, can you present the figures year
by year, with the age and gender of the suspect, as well as the
date, location and nature of the charge.
- How many suspects are currently being sought after failing to
answer bail in your force area?
- Please could you list the types of charges involved, or if that
is too large a task, could you say how many of those are facing
charges of Murder, Attempted murder, Rape, Attempted rape, Armed
robbery, Attempted armed robbery, Sexual offences against a child,
Making indecent images of children.
- Please could you tell me how long is the longest outstanding
warrant in relation to the above?
I would like to clarify that by "bail" I meant only court bail,
ie. post-charge bail, not any other kind.
Response
In accordance with section 1(1) (a) of the Act our response is
provided below;
I can confirm that the authority holds the information you are
requesting.
In considering whether or not your requests should be aggregated
or dealt with separately I have determined that your request is
concerned entirely with bail and kindred matters and as such no
part of your request should be considered separately.
Therefore in accordance with section 12 (1) of the Act we are
unable to provide the information you have requested as to do so it
is estimated would exceed the appropriate limit. The appropriate
limit is defined in the Data Protection and Freedom of Information
(Fees and Appropriate Limit) Regulations 2004, which is covered by
statutory Instrument Number 3244 of 2004. Furthermore, Section 12
of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 allows a public authority to
refuse to respond to a request for information where the cost of
compliance would exceed the appropriate limit as defined by the
above mentioned regulations.
I have arrived at this decision after taking into account the
work required to not only to determine if the information was held
but also to locate, retrieve and extract the information from other
information in order to disclose it. The first request would
require the manual examination of all custody records and or case
files for the six plus years of the request, that is approximately
180,000 records to be examined. This alone would probably take
around 18 months work for one person.
We are unable to offer a solution to your request that would
produce meaningful information within the cost limits.
Back to Category List