1.How many arrests did Cheshire Police make for possession of
cocaine between:
· 1st January 2009 through to, and including, 31st December
2009?
· 1st January 2010 through to, and including, 31st December
2010?
2. How many charges did Cheshire Police make for possession of
cocaine between:
· 1st January 2009 through to, and including, 31st December
2009? How many of these resulted in a conviction?
· 1st January 2010 through to, and including, 31st December
2010? How many of these resulted in a conviction?
3. How many arrests did Cheshire Police make for possession of
cocaine with intent to supply between:
· 1st January 2009 through to, and including, 31st December
2009?
· 1st January 2010 through to, and including, 31st December
2010?
4. How many charges did Cheshire Police make for possession of
cocaine with intent to supply between:
· 1st January 2009 through to, and including, 31st December
2009? How many of these resulted in a conviction?
· 1st January 2010 through to, and including, 31st December
2010? How many of these resulted in a conviction?
5. How many arrests did Cheshire Police make for importing
cocaine with intent to supply between:
· 1st January 2009 through to, and including, 31st December
2009?
· 1st January 2010 through to, and including, 31st December
2010?
6. How many charges did Cheshire Police make for importing
cocaine with intent to supply between:
· 1st January 2009 through to, and including, 31st December
2009? How many of these resulted in a conviction?
· 1st January 2010 through to, and including, 31st December
2010? How many of these resulted in a conviction?
7. How many people tested positive for cocaine after being
arrested by Cheshire Police between:
· 1st January 2009 through to, and including, 31st December
2009?
· 1st January 2010 through to, and including, 31st December
2010?
8. How many cases of violence relating to cocaine did Cheshire
Police deal with between:
· 1st January 2009 through to, and including, 31st December
2009?
· 1st January 2010 through to, and including, 31st December
2010?
9. How old was the youngest person to be arrested by Cheshire
Police for possession of cocaine between 1st January and 31st
December 2009? How old was the eldest?
10. How old was the youngest person to be charged by Cheshire
Police for possession of cocaine between 1st January and 31st
December 2009? How old was the eldest?
11. How old was the youngest person to test positive for cocaine
between 1st January and 31st December 2009? How old was the
eldest?
Please note I have numbered your questions for ease of
reference.
From our preliminary assessment, we estimate that compliance
with your request would exceed the appropriate costs limit under
section 12 of the Freedom of information Act 2000. This is
currently £450. The reason for this is in relation to your
questions 2, 4 & 6. To obtain this data would require a manual
examination of over 650 records and cross referencing them with
other records held on the Police National Computer. This it is
estimated would take just under five days or approximately £875. In
addition question 8 would take a similar amount of time to manually
examine each case file for mention of violence whilst under the
influence of a drug.
This therefore would exceed the appropriate limit. The
appropriate limit is defined in the Data Protection and Freedom of
Information (Fees and Appropriate Limit) Regulations 2004, which is
covered by statutory Instrument Number 3244 of 2004. Furthermore,
Section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 allows a public
authority to refuse to respond to a request for information where
the cost of compliance would exceed the appropriate limit as
defined by the above mentioned regulations.
Rather than refuse your request I have provided information to
answer those questions that can be answered within the cost limits
and indicated where we do not hold the information requested as
follows:
Data relates to both primary and secondary reasons for arrest. A
person may be arrested for drink driving primarily (primary arrest)
and then subsequently be found to be in possession of cocaine
during search. They then would have a secondary arrest on the same
record for possession (secondary arrest).
Question 1.
| |
2009 |
2010 |
| Possess a controlled drug of Class A - Cocaine
(recordable) |
275 |
236 |
| Possess a controlled drug of Class A - Crack Cocaine
(recordable) |
34 |
15 |
Question 2: Unable to provide within cost limits.Question
3:
| |
2009 |
2010 |
| Attempt to possess with intent to supply a controlled drug of
Class A - Cocaine (recordable) |
|
1 |
| Possess with intent to supply a controlled drug of Class A -
Cocaine (recordable) |
40 |
46 |
| Possess with intent to supply a controlled drug of Class A -
Crack Cocaine (recordable) |
8 |
6 |
Question 4: Unable to provide within cost limits.
Question 5: This information is not held. There is no
specific offence code for importing cocaine, only for importing
Class A.
Question 6 Unable to provide within cost limits.
Question 7: There is no information held.
Question 8: Unable to provide within cost limits. (although its
unlikely that this will be held)
Questions 9 & 10: Youngest was 16 years old and the
eldest was 54 years old for both questions.
Question 11: This information is not held.
I am unable to offer a realistic alternative or refinement to
your question 2, 4, 6 & 8.
Please note also: Police forces in the United Kingdom are
routinely required to provide crime statistics to government bodies
and the recording criteria is set nationally. However, the systems
used for recording these figures are not generic, nor are the
procedures used locally in capturing the crime data. It should be
noted that for these reasons this force's response to your
questions should not be used for comparison purposes with any other
response you may receive