Quickly exit this site by pressing the Escape key Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
The police super-complaints system allows designated organisations to raise issues on behalf of the public about harmful patterns or trends in policing.
Further information is available on the Police super complaints page on the gov.uk website.
Recommendation |
Initial Constabulary Response 2nd February 2024 |
Recommendation 1. Chief constables |
Our Superintendent lead for stop and search has reviewed our section 60 training provision and will continue to do so on at least an annual basis. We now include a mandatory training input for all new recruits and additional content is delivered to all newly promoted sergeants.
This year the internal review has been supplemented by a peer review undertaken by colleagues in the West Mercia force.
|
Recommendation 3. Chief constables |
On reviewing this recommendation, we have found that briefings in Cheshire are provided but not all are recorded.
Our Superintendent lead for Stop and Search has made a policy decision on this and from January 2024 we will ensure that all briefings are recorded. We have updated our policy, and the changes will be communicated via weekly orders and updated training packages.
We have also updated our briefing template to ensure that all the bullet points from recommendation 3 are included.
We have reviewed our debriefing arrangements and are satisfied that we already comply with this element of the recommendation. All S60s are fully debriefed, and a record is attached to the Niche occurrence. Debrief actions are incorporated into our Stop and Search continuous improvement plan. Excerpt from Stop and Search Policy: Cheshire Constabulary intelligence briefing systems must be regularly refreshed, providing frontline officers with up-to-date intelligence, supporting them in preventing and detecting crime.
Section 60 authorisation briefings must be recorded. This may be as a written briefing. But formal verbal section 60 authorisation briefings should be given on audiovisual devices such as body-worn video or approved handheld communication devices (Briefings can recorded on teams if that is the platform used to brief officers). The briefings should be available for review and scrutiny by attaching the recording to the s60 OEL. This also applies to any formal debriefs relating to S60’s.
Section 60 briefings and debriefs with officers who are required to use their stop and search powers should include information on: |
Recommendation 4. Chief constables |
Our Superintendent lead for stop and search has reviewed this recommendation, and we are satisfied that we comply. We have built compliance into our new stop and search app, so officers undertaking stop and search including section 60 encounters are prompted to consider the vulnerability of all subjects, but especially children:
Vulnerability Prompt in App – Does the person stopped have any vulnerabilities that require VPA/safeguarding referral? Yes or No (if so submit VPA).
Where vulnerable children are identified, it is mandatory for officers to complete and submit a vulnerable person assessment (VPA). This. Along with other safeguarding measures have been built into policy.
Our Op Protected ensures that additional safeguarding options are considered when we come into contact with Children who may be at risk of exploitation through so called county lines drug dealing.
Excerpt from Op protected guidance:
When officers stop & search a young person who is not with their parent/guardian or carer, then the officers should make reasonable attempts to notify a parent/guardian or carer as soon as practicable that the CYP has been searched and the reasons for the search and document this in their pocket notebook. This may be by phone or in person. Where it has not been possible to contact a responsible adult, the officer should document what attempts have been made and submit a VPA. A VPA must be submitted for all searches involving a child, including searches of involving EIP or where force was used to facilitate the search.
In addition to this, any key vulnerability factors identified during the search must be subject of a VPA to ensure the right support is in place for the child; these could be, but not limited to, Neurodiversity issues, risk of CE/CSE, medical or special education needs, physical disability or child in care/subject of child protection plan or where the officer has been unable to secure the attendance of an AA or the AA in uninterested in the search of the child (think of the wider impact on the child in that setting when at home).
In line with recommendation 1, we will continue to review our training provision and will include this recommendation in our evaluations. |
Recommendation 5. Chief constables |
Our superintendent lead for stop and search has reviewed this recommendation, and we are satisfied that we comply.
Details of section 60 searches are communicated via our social media channels as soon as is practicable. We also publish section 60 debriefs on our force website. We hold community cohesion groups (CCG) – a form of external scrutiny - in all 9 of our local policing areas. We ensure that section 60 debriefs relevant to each local policing area, are included on the agenda for the respective CCG.
We include communication with communities as a standing agenda item in our section 60 debriefs. Compliance failures are documented in the Force continuous improvement plan and in line with recommendation 1, are worked into the training for new inspectors.
|
Recommendation 7. Chief constables |
Our Superintendent lead for stop and search has reviewed this recommendation and has concluded that we do not fully comply with this recommendation. As a result, we are reviewing the requirement to include recordings of briefings and BWV footage to our Police Accountability Meeting (PAM).
Example from PAM: Stop Search Data Report – Section 60 Page 18 (Point 1) Section 60 Volumes There were 111 Section 60 stop searches in the latest quarter in Congleton (89) & Crewe (22). Searches in Crewe were in Nantwich were conducted on 17/09/23 in relation to Males with Machetes & possible Firearms. Searches in Congleton were in Sandbach and conducted between 22/09/23-24/09/23 in relation to intel of weapons being bought in for a fight.
Page 18 (Point 2) Section 60 Outcomes In most searches (131, 84.5%), Nothing found- No Further Action was the outcome. Police action was taken in 15.5% of searches (24). Recommendation 7 has also been remitted to a superintendent lead for external scrutiny, including community cohesion groups who will ensure that the points from this recommendation are incorporated into our legitimacy framework.
|
Recommendation 8. Chief constables and police and crime commissioners (or equivalents) |
Our superintendent lead for stop and search has reviewed this recommendation and has concluded that we do not comply in full.
We are working with the University of Chester to set up a youth only stop and search / use of force scrutiny panel involving law students from a range of diverse backgrounds and incorporating a new and improved “ride along” scheme. In light of this report, we have decided to include section 60 stop and search within the remit of the new panel.
This recommendation has also been remitted to a superintendent lead for external scrutiny, including community cohesion groups who will ensure that the points from this recommendation are incorporated into our legitimacy framework.
|
Recommendation 10. National Police Chiefs’ Council, Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, Home Office and chief constables |
Responses will appear on the Super complaints page on the website. |
Super-complaint made by Liberty and Southall Black Sisters about the police sharing immigration data.
Further details about Police super-complaints: police data sharing for immigration purposes
Response to recommendations made in the report to the NPCC and HMICFRS.
Recommendation 1
The constabulary has been advised that the NPCC has worked closely with the Home Office and relevant NGOs in a series of workshops exploring the implications of a firewall and examining all possible solutions with the goal of increasing the confidence to report for all victims with an insecure immigration status. Those workshops have concluded and the Home Office is due to publish its review before Christmas. Once the outcome of the review is known, the NPCC will then continue to work with the Home Office to deliver those outcomes and update the current safeguarding and information sharing protocol with Immigration Enforcement. The Constabulary is therefore awaiting the outcome of the Home Office review and the subsequent update to the safeguarding and information protocol before taking any further action. We will, of course, ensure that the protocol is adopted as soon as it is made available to us.
Recommendation 4
Cheshire Cares is Cheshire Constabulary’s commissioned victim support service. It provides victim support for all victims of crime and for those needing more bespoke victim services seeks to signpost them onwards to specialist resources or organisations. There is no disparity in service towards any victims, including those who may have varying immigration status.
Cheshire Constabulary works in close partnership with the four local authority Independent Domestic Violence Advocate Services (IDVA) who are fully cited on the super complaint and the recommendations made therein. They have confirmed that the referral of Domestic Abuse victims to them for the police and other agencies, and the service they provide thereafter, is in no way influenced by the individual’s immigration status.
As per our response to recommendation 1 (above) we are awaiting the outcome of the Home Office review and the subsequent update to the safeguarding and information protocol. We will work with our partners to ensure that the protocol is adopted as soon as it is made available to us.
Recommendation 5
As per our response to recommendation 1 (above) we are awaiting the outcome of the Home Office review and the subsequent update to the safeguarding and information protocol. We will ensure that we adopt the protocol as soon as it is made available to us.
We will then seek to maximise communication and engagement opportunities with the public in order to increase confidence regarding safe reporting pathways.